Louis Scerbo
School: | Drexel University |
Department: | Chemistry |
Location: | Philadelphia, PA |
Overall Rating
rated by 20 students
Helpfulness | |
Clarity | |
Easiness |
School: | Drexel University |
Department: | Chemistry |
Location: | Philadelphia, PA |
Helpfulness | |
Clarity | |
Easiness |
Mailing Address:
Uloop Inc.
306 S. Washington Ave
Suite 400
Royal Oak, MI 48067
Telephone Support:
312.854.7605
Email Support:
support@uloop.com
Post your own housing listing on Uloop and have students reach out to you!
Cons: He can seem kind of dismissive sometimes at the questions you ask even though you need to ask questions to be careful in this lab. He gets pretty irritated if you screw something up or break glassware in a manner that the lab manual warned against.
As another person mentioned, purity didn't count against you. Yield didn't count against you. He never gave 20 minute shpiels in the beginning of class like I have seen other professors do. Walking into lab was never a solemn occasion since there is no reason to be unhappy if you're in his section. Other TAs apparently grade far more harshly. A good guy to talk to during lab with his cool stories and he's got some pretty funny jokes too. Having him in lab is way better than in recitation since you get direct access to his expertise. He tells you exactly what will be on the quizzes (for example "quiz next week on experiments 3, 4, and 5 no mechanisms") but the questions can still be pretty tricky. The final had some tricks on it too but there's no reason to fail this class.
Cons: MAKES MISTAKES WHEN GRADING---Check and Recheck all mistakes
Sometimes tests from material not covered--and then forgets that he didn't teach it (know that DMSO changes halogens' nucleophilicities so F is a better nuc when doing SN2 reactions with DMSO)
lectures from power points that were made for a community college in Texas--so not very reflective of test type, office hours won't help
spend time with the material, make an effort to go to class often--but make sure to go to review lectures(two lectures before exam), on the test if you're unsure then explain in your own words
Cons: The lecture notes are from the book. And it seems like he didn't even read them before class started. He makes plenty of mistakes that the students have to correct him on. Sometimes he's not sure why the answer he gave is wrong. He tells you from the start that he won't teach you common names, but that your other professors will want you to know them. If you need O Chem 1-3, you'll have O Chem 3 nearly impossible. He doesn't prepare you for it
Cons: His lectures consist of slides that come along with the textbook. He skips around a lot in the textbook. My advice is to skip buying the expensive textbook for his class because he does not follow it.
In order to excel in his class, make sure you attend the lectures where he teaches from his past exams. If you can understand and study that, then you will be fine.
Cons: He will randomly cancel class without telling anyone, and also does not give partial credit on his exams. He is also the hardest guy to contact unless it is in person.
He is a good teacher if you want to get an A in orgo without learning the material. If you actually want to learn the theory instead of just doing reactions, then take the class with someone else.
Cons: Generally doesn't care about students or teaching effectively. He races through material and cancels class the day before the exam. Going to his office hours is a waste of time. I was warned of this and it held true for my class as well: he will surprise you on the exam with something he's barely talked about. Unless you've been reading the textbook nightly, the exams are going to be rough.
Exams are overly complicated and often include things he never talked about. Not an easy teacher
Cons: he certainly knows his chemistry and ends up going into extreme extreme detail whihc might leave you confused at times.
overall, he is a good teacher compared to others though! i would recomend him if you are plannin on takin the MCAT's
Cons: 3 tests
final is worth 50% of your grade
doesn't give a lot of review material
a lot of the work is done on your own
pay attention and go to every lecture. If you do that, read the chapters in the book and do all the practice problems you should be ok. Also, studying in a group is a big help because he doesn't do the best job of relaying the material so it helps to have a group so you can all help each other understand the concepts
Cons: Tests are hard and the final is worth 50% of your grade...
Organic chem sucks, but if you have to take it you should take it with him.
Just don't ask a question about something he just went over 5 seconds beforehand because he'll get annoyed and most likely make fun of you while he answers your question. (I don't mind it because I find it hilarious, but if you can't handle that then don't bother asking.)
The secret is to study in a group because, trust me, you will not pick up everything on your own. Use the practice tests to test yourself and make sure you understand how to get from A to B in the reactions. Have someone else write the problem and then try to solve it without looking at the practice exam. The key is to understand, not just memorize, and then you'll be able to handle whatever he throws at you. And most importantly, DO NOT MISS CLASS WHEN HE GOES OVER THE PRACTICE EXAMS.
In my opinion, it was an easy class and an easy A.
Never had him for lecture, but I could possibly see how his laid-back nature could make a lecture a bit harder. However, I think orgo chem lecture classes just plain suck no matter who you have. I'm not sure that taking another professor will change that too much.
Good luck!